Bill Jamieson: Enterprise is what these areas lack

Nicola Sturgeon and John Swinney have been staunch advocates of the Enterpise Area policy. Picture: Sandy YoungNicola Sturgeon and John Swinney have been staunch advocates of the Enterpise Area policy. Picture: Sandy Young
Nicola Sturgeon and John Swinney have been staunch advocates of the Enterpise Area policy. Picture: Sandy Young
GOVERNMENT pins its hopes on policy which even its own agency says is an abject failure, writes Bill Jamieson

Abject failure: no two words better describe a central pillar of the Scottish Government’s economic policy in recent years.

A damning report this week finds that the much-trumpeted creation of Enterprise Areas (EAs) – cited at almost every opportunity as an example of government assistance to the business sector – has fallen flat on its face.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The report, by Highlands and Islands Enterprise – one of the government’s own agencies – finds that they have had hardly any impact in attracting new enterprise and creating employment since 2012.

Enterprise Areas were a key element of the Scottish Government’s 2011 economic strategy. Fourteen areas were chosen in 2012 and a 15th in 2013. In life sciences, these included sites in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Forres, Inverness and Irvine.

In renewable energy, the areas were specific sites in Lewis, Orkney, Easter Ross and Caithness, as well as the ports of Dundee and Leith. In growth sectors of manufacturing, the policy drew in part of Glasgow and Prestwick, with Broxburn and Livingston in West Lothian.

Only last September First Minister Nicola Sturgeon declared that “enterprise areas in Scotland at sites like Irvine and Edinburgh’s Bioquarter are already doing a terrific job creating new economic opportunities, new partnerships with education and – most importantly – new jobs across the country”.

But the report delivers a damning verdict on the government’s enterprise support claims and begs the most searching questions of a key area of Scottish public policy.

It finds that “to date there are no new employers in nine of the 15 EAs, whilst a number that have taken up occupancy since April 2012 had planned to do so prior to designation or would have done without the EA incentives.

“In practice, identifiable additional employment generation in local areas due to EA status has been small and, in Scotland as a whole, once displacement of activity is taken into account, minimal to-date.”

Moreover, there was “no evidence to date of the EA status itself having had an impact in attracting inward investment to Scotland”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

HIE’s report concluded: “There is a general impression that the financial incentives are lightweight, and would not be significant in larger companies’ location decision.”

It highlights “the slower than expected progress in supply chain activity associated with offshore wind, wave, and tidal installations. This has limited the demand for space by businesses that might become involved in these renewable energy sub-sectors, which means that the EA incentives associated with the low carbon/renewables north and east sites have in the main yet to become relevant.”

So much for Scotland becoming “the Saudi Arabia of renewables”.

It finds that just 18 companies together saved only about £100,000 a year from their business rates bills as a result of the policy – a “windfall” for some of them rather than an aid to investment. There was one example of a capital allowance being claimed – for just £90,000.

Skills Development Scotland, another Scottish Government agency, should have helped with training and recruitment. But the review found no evidence of that happening, and some participating companies were unaware that it was meant to.

Now there are mitigating circumstances and not all of the blame can be heaped on the Enterprise Area policy alone. The period covered by the HIE analysis was one in which businesses across the UK were battling in the aftermath of a severe recession. Confidence was at a markedly low ebb and business investment overall was depressed. At the same time bank lending to business had fallen off sharply. Even for an established and successful business, getting a loan for expansion was no easy matter.

Then there are European Union constraints – a point about which we are unlikely to hear much from the staunchly pro-EU SNP administration. “It is important to acknowledge,” says the report, “that EU state aid rules introduced since the Enterprise Zone era significantly limit the extent to which member states can offer incentives to businesses to attract investment to a particular area or support business growth.”